← Blog

UML Modeling for Architecture Reviews

A pragmatic approach to using UML in architecture reviews: what to model, what to skip, and how to align teams with shared artifacts.

Open Workbench Watch Demo Start Building Free

UML is most valuable in reviews when it reduces ambiguity quickly. The goal isn’t perfect diagrams — it’s shared understanding.

What to model (high signal)

  • Class diagram: core entities, relationships, and ownership
  • Sequence diagram: one critical end-to-end flow
  • Activity diagram: business workflow with branching/approvals
  • State machine: lifecycle for stateful entities

What to skip (low signal)

  • Diagrams that don’t answer a concrete question
  • Exhaustive modeling of UI details
  • One-off views that aren’t tied to a core workflow

Review checklist

  • Can everyone name the core entities?
  • Is ownership clear in relationships?
  • Do flows match the model?
  • Are state transitions explicit where needed?

Next steps